Pusher
You don't have a chance. Seize it!
Overview
A drug pusher grows increasingly desperate after a botched deal leaves him with a large debt to a ruthless drug lord.
Backdrop
What makes this movie Worth Watching
Set in Copenhagen's criminal underworld, 'Pusher' offers a commentary on Danish society during the 1990s. The film was part of Refn's 'Pusher Trilogy', which explores various aspects of drug trafficking and its consequences.
- The movie showcases a raw and gritty portrayal of the underworld, making it a must-watch for those who appreciate realistic crime dramas.
- Nicolas Winding Refn's directorial debut offers a unique style that combines intense close-ups with striking visuals, creating an immersive experience for viewers.
- The film delves into complex themes of addiction, guilt, and redemption, making it thought-provoking and engaging.
- Mads Mikkelsen's breakout performance as the troubled drug dealer Frank is one of the standout aspects of the movie.
Fun Facts
- 'Pusher' was shot in just 23 days with a budget of less than $400,000.
- The iconic score for the movie was composed by Refn's long-time collaborator Cliff Martinez.
- During the filming, Mads Mikkelsen lost over 15 kg to accurately portray the physical toll of his character's drug addiction.
Available Languages
English
US
Title:
"You don't have a chance. Seize it!"
Italiano
IT
Title: Pusher - L'inizio
""
Français
FR
Title: Pusher
""
Deutsch
DE
Title:
""
Pусский
RU
Title: Дилер
""
Español
ES
Title: Pusher, un paseo por el abismo
""
Where to Watch
Cast
Crew
Reviews
A solid crime thriller.
'Pusher' entertained me enough, though the plot did feel a bit repetitive as it felt like it kept 'going around in circles' to me personally. Some of the lighting and editing (as in cuts) choices also made the film feel a little more underwhelming.
The cast do well, arguably the film's strongest element. Kim Bodnia makes for a solid lead, though his performance is a tad samey throughout - similar to the aforementioned. Mads Mikkelsen's Tonny sticks out because he is being played by Mads Mikkelsen, the character is OK - underused perhaps, though I may just think that as it's Mads... the whole reason I chose to view this trilogy, to be honest.
6/10 would feel harsh so this 1996 release gets 7/10 from yours truly. I didn't overly enjoy it, though I can't exactly say I disliked it either... probably levels out at watchable.
Oscar Awards
Wins
Haven't Won A Oscar
Nominations
Haven't Nominated for Oscar